Entities Blocking UFO Disclosure: Dr. Steven Greer’s Allegations and Evidence

Dr. Steven Greer, founder of the Disclosure Project, has consistently identified defense contractors, covert government factions, and intelligence agencies as primary obstacles to UFO transparency

Feb 21, 2025

Part Two: Dr. Steven Greer, founder of the Disclosure Project, has consistently identified defense contractors, covert government factions, and intelligence agencies as primary obstacles to UFO transparency. His decades-long advocacy highlights a network of corporate and bureaucratic interests allegedly suppressing evidence of extraterrestrial technology and energy systems.

Part One. If you missed it, put eyeballs on this because Dr Greer’s 2023 Disclosure hearings and the good guy / bad guy shenanigans. The bad guy - beyond black ops top secret - fear porn trafficking not only narcotics, but abducted humans, and vs the free energy technologies and interstellar travel of the do no harm evolved races.

In Parts Three and Four is a dive into Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) lawsuit targeting corporations and individuals involved in suppressing UFO-related technologies.
Apologies for Substack messing up the reference index.

Defense Contractors and the Military-Industrial Complex

Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works: Reverse-Engineering and Secrecy

Greer identifies Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works, a division renowned for advanced aerospace projects, as a central player in reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology. He claims the Tic-Tac UFOs observed during the 2004 Nimitz incident were man-made vehicles developed by Skunk Works4 7. According to Greer, Lockheed has operated beyond congressional oversight, hiding propulsion systems derived from recovered alien crafts. These technologies, he argues, could revolutionize energy production but are stifled to maintain fossil fuel dependencies49.

Raytheon and Northrop Grumman: Triangular Craft and Black Budgets

Greer alleges Raytheon and Northrop Grumman produce trapezoidal and triangular aircraft often mistaken for extraterrestrial vehicles. Testimonies from whistleblowers describe these companies’ involvement in “Deep Black” projects—illegal programs unacknowledged even within classified government frameworks79. For instance, Greer’s uncle, a Northrop Grumman employee, reportedly confirmed the development of large triangular craft, which Greer links to covert operations involving drug trafficking and human trafficking7. These projects are funded through undisclosed budgets, evading legal scrutiny and public accountability9.

Government and Intelligence Agencies

The CIA and Controlled Disclosure Narratives

Greer accuses the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of orchestrating disinformation campaigns to manipulate public perception. He cites the CIA’s historical use of figures like Alex Jones to propagate “alien threat” narratives, framing UFOs as national security risks to justify militarization7 12. During the 1990s, CIA scientist Dr. Harold Puthoff allegedly collaborated with Greer but later shifted to promoting pseudoscientific projects like remote viewing, which Greer views as distractions from genuine disclosure713. The agency is also accused of vetting whistleblowers who appear in mainstream media, ensuring their testimonies align with a “controlled disclosure” narrative that avoids exposing suppressed technologies7 12.

The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO)

The Pentagon’s AARO, tasked with investigating UAPs, has drawn criticism for its lack of transparency. Greer argues that AARO’s placement under the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence ensures continued secrecy, as reports are heavily redacted using “B7 exemptions” to withhold evidence under the guise of law enforcement investigations6 12. Former officials like Lue Elizondo, who led the predecessor to AARO, have alleged institutional resistance to disclosure, with Greer claiming the office serves as a “fig leaf” to placate Congress while hiding advanced technologies1213.

The “Illegal, Corrupt Organization”

Greer frequently references a “shadow government”—a clandestine network of military, corporate, and intelligence officials operating outside democratic oversight. This group allegedly controls “Deep Black” projects, bypassing legal appropriations processes to fund operations through illicit means, including drug trafficking and arms sales7 14. Testimonies from whistleblowers, such as Marine Michael Herrera, describe encounters with these groups during covert missions, where advanced aircraft were used to transport illicit materials and individuals713.

Project 2025 and Policy Barriers

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a conservative policy blueprint for a potential second Trump administration, has drawn Greer’s criticism for omitting UFO disclosure from its agenda (no surprises there). Over 140 former Trump officials contributed to the project, which prioritizes deregulation and centralizing executive power—a framework Greer argues enables continued secrecy by weakening congressional oversight6 14. Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) further complicates disclosure efforts, as her reversal on surveillance policies raises concerns about expanded FISA authority and potential abuse of classified programs6 12.

Corporate Complicity and Technological Suppression

Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

Greer implicates Elon Musk in stifling disclosure through his leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which prioritizes privatizing federal functions. Musk has publicly dismissed extraterrestrial claims, asserting Starlink satellites would detect alien activity—a stance Greer attributes to Musk’s vested interest in maintaining control over energy and aerospace markets13. The DOGE’s transfer of sensitive data to private servers, criticized as a “power grab,” aligns with broader corporate efforts to monopolize advanced technologies1314.

Energy Suppression and Zero-Point Technology

Greer’s research emphasizes the suppression of zero-point energy (ether) systems, which he claims could replace fossil fuels. Patents for such technologies, allegedly filed by inventors like Nikola Tesla, are buried by corporate entities like Raytheon and Lockheed to protect energy monopolies49. Whistleblowers from defense contractors have reportedly confirmed the existence of functional prototypes, but legal threats and nondisclosure agreements prevent public release713.

Case Studies in Disinformation and Control

The “Fake Alien Invasion” Narrative

Greer warns of a staged alien threat to justify global militarization, likening it to the plot of Independence Day. He cites leaked documents and whistleblower accounts describing plans to deploy man-made UFOs in false flag operations, creating a pretext for space-based weapons systems7 14. Media figures like Tucker Carlson and outlets like 60 Minutes are accused of collaborating with intelligence agencies to promote this narrative while dismissing authentic evidence713.

The Rockefeller Initiative and Clinton-Era Secrecy

During the 1990s, Greer participated in the Rockefeller Initiative, an effort to brief the Clinton administration on UFOs. Classified documents reveal that CIA scientist Dr. Ronald Pandolfi orchestrated a disinformation campaign, commissioning flawed reports to discredit extraterrestrial evidence1114. Lawrence Rockefeller’s threats to publicly demand disclosure forced the White House to declassify limited information, but critical details remain suppressed1114.

Conclusion: Systemic Barriers to Transparency

Dr. Steven Greer’s allegations paint a systemic picture of obstruction involving defense contractors, intelligence agencies, and unelected bureaucracies. The interplay between corporate profit motives and national security paradigms has created a “wall of secrecy” around UFO technologies, perpetuated through disinformation, legal threats, and institutional inertia. While whistleblowers and congressional advocates push for transparency, the lack of subpoena power and bipartisan political will ensures that transformative technologies remain hidden. As debates over Project 2025 and DOGE reforms unfold, the path to disclosure hinges on dismantling these entrenched networks of control.